Built for extension creators, security-conscious developers, and growth teams who want stronger trust signals and cleaner Web Store submissions.
Paste your manifest.json and detect overbroad permissions that can create policy friction or increase review scrutiny.
Your findings will appear here. Perm Check highlights high-risk permissions, commonly unnecessary declarations, and practical remediation guidance.
Perm Check turns an error-prone manual manifest review into a rapid, repeatable audit. Instead of scanning each permission line by line, you paste your file once and receive immediate, structured findings. This shortens pre-submission review cycles, accelerates release preparation, and keeps momentum high across teams shipping frequent extension updates.
Every unnecessary permission increases perceived and practical risk. Perm Check highlights sensitive access declarations that may exceed functional needs, helping you implement least-privilege principles with confidence. This discipline improves your extension’s security posture, reduces unnecessary data surface exposure, and supports stronger trust narratives in product listings and privacy disclosures.
Manifest hygiene is a quality signal, not just a compliance checkbox. Perm Check helps teams align requested permissions with actual functionality, reducing mismatch issues during QA and review. Cleaner manifests are easier to maintain, easier to document, and easier for stakeholders to validate, resulting in fewer release blockers and stronger operational consistency.
Search visibility increasingly depends on trust and reputation signals around your product ecosystem. Perm Check supports cleaner extension governance, which strengthens user confidence, reduces negative reviews tied to overreaching permissions, and supports higher quality brand content. Better trust outcomes can indirectly improve branded search performance and long-term acquisition efficiency.
Bloggers who publish productivity extensions often operate with small teams and limited legal guidance. Perm Check helps them validate manifest permission scope before launch, reducing the chance of avoidable policy flags. The result is faster publishing, fewer support issues, and better audience trust around data access transparency.
Developers managing rapid release cycles can accidentally leave stale or broad permissions in place as features evolve. Perm Check provides a focused pre-release control that identifies drift quickly. Engineering teams can tighten permissions, document rationale, and improve reliability of security reviews without interrupting delivery velocity.
Digital marketers responsible for growth and retention need extension listings that convert confidently. Perm Check supports messaging aligned with privacy expectations by helping teams request only necessary access. Cleaner permission profiles can improve user comfort, reduce install hesitation, and strengthen conversion performance in competitive extension categories.
Perm Check is a focused auditing tool designed to review the permissions declared in a Chrome extension manifest and identify entries that appear broader than necessary for your stated feature set. Many extension developers assume that adding extra permissions early in development creates flexibility for later feature expansion. In practice, this habit often creates friction. Chrome Web Store reviewers may question broad access, users may hesitate at installation prompts, and internal teams may struggle to justify why certain scopes exist. Perm Check addresses this by transforming manifest review from an informal guess into a repeatable, evidence-oriented quality step.
A manifest file is more than a technical requirement. It is also a trust declaration. Every permission communicates intent, and intent has legal, security, and product consequences. If your extension requests tabs, scripting, activeTab, storage, host permissions on wildcard domains, and optional permissions all at once, reviewers and users infer that your extension needs deep control over browsing behavior. That might be accurate for some products, but often it is not. Perm Check helps you separate necessity from convenience. It highlights potentially excessive declarations and gives you practical language for deciding whether each permission remains justified.
Teams that treat permission governance as a first-class release gate generally experience fewer avoidable delays. They also write clearer privacy disclosures and produce stronger listing copy because they understand exactly what access is required and why. Perm Check supports that maturity model. It is lightweight enough for individual builders and robust enough for organizations that want a consistent pre-submission checklist across multiple extensions.
Another reason Perm Check matters is maintainability. Extension code evolves quickly. Features are added, deprecated, and reworked. Permissions that were once needed can become obsolete after refactoring. Without regular auditing, stale entries remain in the manifest for months. This is not only a policy risk. It also increases engineering uncertainty, because team members cannot easily determine whether a permission is still tied to live functionality. Perm Check gives teams a fast way to identify likely leftovers and clean them before each release.
Permission precision directly influences security posture. The broader your declared access, the larger your potential impact surface in the event of a bug, misuse, or compromise. Least-privilege principles exist to reduce that surface area. By requesting only the permissions a feature absolutely requires, you lower exposure and improve resilience. Perm Check reinforces this approach by flagging entries commonly associated with overreach, especially when they appear without contextual support in the manifest structure.
Precision also affects compliance outcomes. Chrome Web Store review decisions are not based solely on whether your extension technically works. Reviewers evaluate whether your requested access is proportionate to your functionality and disclosures. If permissions appear excessive, your submission can be delayed, questioned, or rejected pending clarification. Every delay has cost. It can interrupt launch schedules, ad campaigns, user onboarding, and partner commitments. Perm Check helps reduce this risk by prompting earlier correction.
From a legal perspective, permission scope intersects with transparency duties. If you request access to browsing contexts or cross-domain resources, your privacy notice and listing language should accurately explain that behavior. Overbroad manifests make that communication harder. Teams may either under-disclose and increase regulatory risk, or over-disclose and reduce conversion by sounding invasive. A tighter manifest simplifies truthful disclosure and strengthens accountability across legal and product functions.
Growth outcomes are influenced as well. Users often decide in seconds whether to install an extension. Permission prompts are part of that decision moment. When requested access feels excessive, installs drop and uninstall rates rise. Ratings can suffer, and trust erosion can spread through reviews. Perm Check supports better first impressions by helping teams align permission requests with clear, defensible user value. That alignment improves confidence and can indirectly support retention, referrals, and branded search demand.
Internally, precision reduces release friction. Product managers, legal reviewers, and security stakeholders can approve updates faster when permission intent is obvious. Instead of debating broad arrays of unclear entries, teams discuss a small set of clearly justified scopes. That shift saves time and creates better release discipline over the long run.
Start by preparing your latest manifest.json from the exact build you intend to ship. Avoid auditing an old local draft while submitting a different artifact. Consistency is critical. Paste that manifest into Perm Check and run the audit. Review each flagged permission one by one. The objective is not to remove everything flagged blindly. The objective is to validate necessity with evidence. If a permission is flagged but essential, document the feature dependency clearly in your internal release notes and public disclosures.
Next, check whether broad host permissions can be narrowed. Many teams default to wildcard host patterns during early development. Before submission, limit patterns to the specific domains your extension actually needs. This single step often improves reviewer confidence and reduces unnecessary user concern. Perm Check findings can guide where this tightening effort should begin.
After making manifest changes, run the extension through functional QA with scenarios that depend on permission-sensitive actions. Confirm that core features still operate as intended. Permission reduction should improve safety without degrading user experience. If something breaks, restore only the minimal permission required and capture the rationale. Repeat audit and QA until the manifest is both lean and operationally complete.
Integrate Perm Check into your definition of done for every release branch. Treat it like linting or test coverage: an expected gate, not an optional extra. Teams that audit only when a rejection occurs end up in reactive mode. Teams that audit continuously avoid many of those surprises. You can assign ownership to engineering leads or release managers, but ensure accountability is explicit.
Use findings to improve documentation. If a permission remains, explain why in plain language in your extension listing and privacy policy. This creates consistency between what your extension asks for and what your users are told. Consistency is a trust multiplier. It also helps support teams answer user questions confidently when permission prompts raise concerns.
Finally, maintain a permission history log across versions. When permissions are added or removed, track who approved the change and what feature justified it. Over time, this history becomes a valuable control artifact. It supports incident response, compliance reviews, and product governance without adding major overhead.
A frequent mistake is assuming that if a permission is technically allowed, it is strategically safe. Policy and trust outcomes depend on proportionality, not just technical validity. Avoid the mindset that broader scope is harmless. Every additional permission must have a current, specific, user-facing purpose.
Another mistake is auditing once and forgetting the issue. Permission drift is common after feature updates, library changes, or rapid bug fixes. A manifest that looked clean last quarter may now contain obsolete access requests. Make audits recurring and tied to release cadence.
Teams also misclassify optional and required permissions. When possible, defer access requests until users trigger relevant functionality. This can improve conversion and perceived transparency. Perm Check can help identify where always-on permissions might be replaced by narrower or deferred patterns.
Some developers remove flagged permissions without validating behavior. That can break features and create emergency re-submissions. Always pair changes with focused QA. A disciplined cycle is audit, adjust, test, and document. Skipping any step creates new risk.
Another pitfall is weak communication. Even a well-scoped manifest can appear suspicious if listing copy and privacy statements are vague. Explain what data access means in practical terms and connect it to user benefit. Clear communication reduces friction with both reviewers and users.
Finally, avoid treating permission governance as an isolated security task. It is a cross-functional quality function involving engineering, legal, product, and growth stakeholders. Perm Check works best when its findings are shared across those teams and translated into decisions everyone understands. When that collaboration becomes routine, extension releases become faster, safer, and easier to trust.
Copy your current manifest.json into the analyzer so Perm Check can inspect declared permissions and host scopes.
Trigger the audit and let the tool evaluate common high-risk, overbroad, and frequently unnecessary permission declarations.
Read flagged items, understand why they may raise review concerns, and identify permissions that can be reduced safely.
Apply least-privilege updates, test core functionality, and submit a cleaner extension package with higher confidence.
Perm Check was built by a cross-disciplinary team of engineers, policy researchers, and growth specialists who believe secure design should be practical, not intimidating. We focus on tools that turn compliance and trust requirements into clear, fast workflows that fit real product timelines.
Our mission is to help extension creators release confidently by combining technical depth with plain-language guidance. We care about speed, transparency, and accessibility because these values shape both user trust and long-term platform success.
Estimated read time: 7 minutes
Extension teams often treat permissions as a one-time setup task during early prototyping. In reality, permissions are a dynamic risk area that changes as features evolve. A manifest that once reflected necessary functionality can become bloated after refactoring, plugin updates, or abandoned experiments. Overbroad permissions trigger practical costs across product, compliance, and growth. Reviewers may request clarification. Users may hesitate to install. Internal teams may spend time debating whether a permission still belongs in production. Perm Check exists to reduce these costs by making permission audits fast and explicit.
When a user sees broad browser access requests, they rarely parse technical nuance. They make a trust decision quickly. If permissions appear excessive, they may leave the listing. That drop in confidence can reduce installation conversion and increase churn after install. Over time, trust signals affect ratings, word of mouth, and brand reputation. Permission hygiene therefore influences business outcomes, not only engineering quality.
Perm Check asks for one thing: your manifest.json. After you paste it, the tool evaluates declared permissions and host scopes for patterns commonly associated with unnecessary breadth. Findings are presented in clear language so teams can decide what to remove, what to justify, and what to monitor in future releases. This process helps teams apply least-privilege principles without slowing development. Instead of manual guesswork, builders get structured feedback they can act on immediately.
The tool is especially useful in pre-submission windows, when teams need to harden release quality quickly. Running a permission audit before final QA creates time to tighten scopes and retest safely. Running it only after rejection forces reactive work under pressure. Perm Check moves that work upstream, where changes are cheaper and easier.
A permission gate is simply a release rule: no extension ships unless manifest permissions are reviewed and justified. This is similar to requiring tests or dependency scans. The reason is straightforward. Permissions are a high-impact artifact that affects legal exposure, security posture, and user trust at the same time. A lightweight gate prevents accidental sprawl and keeps teams aligned on what the extension truly needs.
Perm Check makes this gate realistic even for small teams. Solo creators and early-stage startups rarely have dedicated policy specialists. They need tools that produce useful decisions without heavy process overhead. By flagging likely problem areas and prompting rationale-based cleanup, Perm Check helps teams build discipline without bureaucracy.
Success is not just fewer flags. It is clearer product intent. Teams that use Perm Check regularly tend to ship manifests that map cleanly to user-facing features. Their listing copy becomes more precise. Their privacy statements become easier to maintain. Their support channels see fewer permission-related concerns. Internal approval cycles become faster because stakeholders can review a concise, documented permission set instead of a broad unresolved list.
In the long run, this maturity improves resilience. When platform policies evolve, disciplined teams adapt quickly because they already understand their own access model. They are not untangling years of unmanaged permissions. They are adjusting a controlled system. That difference can determine whether updates ship smoothly or stall at critical moments.
Perm Check is therefore not a one-time fixer. It is a practical operating habit for teams that want secure growth, stable release cycles, and sustainable trust. In crowded extension categories, that discipline becomes a meaningful advantage.
Estimated read time: 8 minutes
At first glance, manual permission review seems manageable. A developer opens manifest.json, scans permissions arrays, and decides whether entries look reasonable. For one release, this can work. Over time, complexity grows. Features are added quickly, contributors rotate, and historical context gets lost. The person reviewing today may not know why a permission was added six months ago. Without structure, review becomes subjective, slow, and inconsistent.
Manual processes also introduce drift in decision quality. One reviewer may be conservative, another permissive. Some focus on technical necessity, others on policy optics. Inconsistent standards create unpredictable release outcomes. Teams then spend additional time resolving disagreements late in the cycle, when deadlines are tight.
Perm Check compresses the discovery phase. Instead of manually scanning every entry and debating what deserves attention, teams receive a focused list of potentially unnecessary or high-sensitivity permissions. This does not replace human judgment. It improves it by directing attention to the right places first. That targeted starting point cuts review time and reduces meeting overhead.
The tool also improves onboarding. New contributors can understand manifest risk areas quickly without reading long internal notes. They run the audit, study findings, and ask better questions. This shortens ramp-up cycles and reduces the chance of repeating old permission mistakes.
Time savings should be measured across the full release cycle, not just the audit moment. Manual review may seem fast when counted as a single task, but downstream costs often exceed that initial effort. A missed overbroad permission can trigger reviewer questions, listing delays, emergency code changes, and extra QA rounds. These downstream disruptions are expensive and unpredictable.
Perm Check reduces that downstream volatility by catching common permission issues earlier. Teams can fix manifest scope while there is still room for testing and documentation updates. This creates smoother submission timelines and fewer last-minute pivots. Even when no major issues are found, the audit creates confidence that permissions have been reviewed deliberately.
Manual review remains essential for contextual decisions. No tool can know every feature nuance, legal commitment, or product roadmap dependency. Human reviewers should validate whether each flagged permission is truly unnecessary or actually required. They should also ensure disclosures match behavior and that business risks are understood.
The strongest workflow combines automation and expert judgment. Perm Check handles rapid pattern detection. Your team handles policy interpretation, architecture validation, and user communication. This partnership saves time because each layer focuses on what it does best.
If your goal is to protect release velocity while improving trust, Perm Check generally outperforms fully manual alternatives. It does not eliminate review work. It makes that work sharper, faster, and more consistent. Teams that adopt it typically spend less time rediscovering obvious issues and more time making meaningful decisions.
Manual review alone can still succeed in very small projects with stable scope. Once releases become frequent or team size grows, structured tooling becomes the practical choice. Perm Check provides that structure without adding heavy process burden, which is why it delivers strong time savings in real-world extension development.
Estimated read time: 8 minutes
SEO is no longer isolated to keywords and backlinks. Brand trust, user sentiment, and product credibility increasingly influence how audiences engage with your content ecosystem. If your extension receives skepticism because permission requests appear excessive, that friction can reduce adoption, increase negative commentary, and weaken branded search demand over time. Perm Check helps address this upstream by improving permission clarity before users encounter installation prompts.
A strong trust profile creates positive ripple effects. Users who feel safe are more likely to install, retain, recommend, and search for your brand again. Those behaviors can improve click-through on branded queries, increase direct traffic, and support a healthier reputation footprint across review platforms and social channels.
To use Perm Check for SEO support, treat permission auditing as part of your content and launch workflow. Before announcing a new extension feature through blog posts, newsletters, or product pages, run a manifest audit. Remove unnecessary permissions and document why remaining access is required. This ensures your marketing claims about privacy and safety are backed by technical reality.
Then align your public messaging with audited results. If your extension needs specific host permissions, explain the exact benefit in plain language. Transparent explanations reduce confusion and lower bounce from users who compare listing details with website claims. Consistency between code behavior and public content strengthens trust signals that matter for long-term search performance.
Perm Check findings can become high-value educational content. Publish practical guides on how your team applies least-privilege design. Share release notes that explain permission reductions and why they improve user safety. Create FAQ content addressing common permission concerns. These assets attract relevant search traffic and reinforce topical authority around extension security and responsible product development.
You can also use findings to improve conversion copy on landing pages. Replace vague trust statements with specific, verifiable language. For example, describe that your extension requests only scoped permissions tied directly to feature execution. Precision in copy improves user confidence and can increase conversion from organic traffic sources.
SEO impact from permission discipline is usually indirect, so measurement should be multi-metric. Track branded query growth, extension listing conversion, uninstall reasons, average rating trends, and support tickets related to privacy concerns. If permission cleanup is working, you should see fewer trust objections and improved audience willingness to engage with your brand ecosystem.
Also monitor content engagement on pages discussing privacy and security. Higher dwell time and better conversion on trust-focused pages can indicate stronger credibility. Over time, this credibility supports sustainable SEO by improving user satisfaction signals across touchpoints.
In 2026, users are more privacy-aware and less tolerant of unclear data access practices. Platforms continue to tighten enforcement and expectations. Growth teams that integrate technical trust controls into SEO planning will outperform teams that treat security as a separate silo. Perm Check provides a practical bridge between engineering quality and discoverability outcomes.
If your strategy depends on durable brand demand, permission precision should be part of your optimization stack. Run audits before launches, align disclosures with reality, and communicate clearly. The result is not just cleaner compliance. It is stronger trust equity, which compounds into better search performance over time.
Estimated read time: 7 minutes
When one company acquires another company’s extension portfolio, manifest permissions are often reviewed late. That delay can hide integration risk and legal exposure. Perm Check can be used during early diligence to quickly map permission posture across target products. Findings help buyers ask sharper questions about data access, policy history, and remediation workload before closing terms.
This use case is valuable because it translates technical artifacts into strategic risk signals. Instead of broad assumptions, decision-makers see where permission scope might create trust debt or future policy friction. That clarity supports better valuation and transition planning.
New team members often inherit manifests without understanding why each permission exists. Perm Check can serve as a teaching aid in onboarding sessions. Trainers run live audits, review flagged entries, and connect each decision to feature behavior. This helps new developers learn principled permission design early rather than repeating legacy patterns.
Using the tool in education also creates a shared vocabulary. Teams discuss permissions in terms of necessity, risk, and user impact, which improves decision quality long after onboarding ends.
Many teams struggle to keep privacy and compliance documentation synchronized with actual extension behavior. Perm Check findings can be used as evidence inputs when drafting policy updates, data flow summaries, and legal review memos. Instead of writing generic statements, teams can describe permission scope with precision and demonstrate active governance.
This reduces legal ambiguity and helps compliance stakeholders evaluate whether disclosures remain accurate after each release. It also supports audit readiness when external partners request proof of responsible data access practices.
Security programs often run tabletop exercises for incident response, but extension permission profiles are not always included. Perm Check can enrich these drills by identifying where broad permissions could amplify incident impact. Teams can then simulate response scenarios based on realistic access scopes and update playbooks accordingly.
This use case improves preparedness because teams understand not only where vulnerabilities might exist, but also what those vulnerabilities could touch given current permissions. Better visibility enables more accurate containment planning.
In crowded extension niches, many products offer similar feature sets. Trust can become the deciding factor. Teams use Perm Check to keep manifests lean, then communicate that discipline in listing copy, FAQ pages, and launch content. This creates a clear differentiator for privacy-conscious users comparing alternatives.
The strategic benefit is simple. When users feel your extension asks for only what it needs, conversion improves and review quality often follows. Over time, that trust advantage compounds into better retention and stronger market position.
Most teams first discover Perm Check as a submission aid, but its value extends far beyond that moment. It can support acquisition analysis, team enablement, legal alignment, security readiness, and competitive strategy. The common thread is clarity. Better permission clarity leads to better decisions across every layer of extension operations.
If you want the highest return, integrate Perm Check where decisions are made, not only where problems appear. Use it before launches, during planning, and in governance reviews. This approach transforms manifest auditing from a reactive fix into a proactive advantage.
Estimated read time: 8 minutes
A common error is assuming permissions added early remain valid forever. Extension products evolve quickly. Features are deprecated, workflows are redesigned, and code paths change. Static assumptions create permission debt. Teams carry obsolete access requests because no one revisits them. Perm Check fixes this by enabling rapid recurring audits that reveal where permissions may no longer map to active functionality.
By making re-auditing easy, the tool encourages ongoing hygiene instead of one-time cleanup. This reduces drift and improves confidence that each release reflects current product reality.
Many teams wait until Chrome Web Store feedback forces action. This reactive pattern is costly. Late-stage manifest changes can require urgent testing, documentation edits, and launch delays. Perm Check helps break this cycle by fitting naturally into pre-submission workflows. Teams can detect likely concerns before reviewers do and resolve them on their own timeline.
The result is smoother operations and fewer crisis adjustments. Preventive audits generally cost less than corrective audits under deadline pressure.
Some teams overcorrect by stripping every flagged permission immediately. That can break legitimate features and create instability in production. Perm Check is designed to inform decisions, not automate blind removal. The right workflow is to review findings, validate feature dependencies, and retest after each change. This approach balances security improvements with functional reliability.
A disciplined validation loop protects user experience while still achieving least-privilege outcomes. Teams avoid the false choice between safety and functionality.
Permission accuracy is not enough if external communication is vague. Users and reviewers evaluate your listing text, privacy disclosures, and support responses alongside manifest declarations. If these signals conflict, trust declines. Perm Check helps surface where permissions deserve better explanation, enabling teams to align technical scope with clear public language.
This alignment reduces confusion and strengthens credibility. It also helps support teams answer user concerns consistently when permission prompts raise questions.
When only one engineer understands manifest rationale, continuity risk increases. If that person is unavailable, release decisions stall or errors slip through. Perm Check promotes shared understanding by producing visible findings that teams can review together. Product, legal, and engineering stakeholders gain a common basis for discussing risk and necessity.
Over time, this shared context improves governance maturity. Permission decisions become documented, repeatable, and less dependent on individual memory.
Extension permission auditing does not need to be slow, subjective, or crisis-driven. Most recurring mistakes come from poor timing, inconsistent standards, and weak documentation habits. Perm Check addresses each of these issues with a practical, fast, and understandable workflow. Teams can detect likely problems earlier, make smarter decisions, and communicate more clearly.
If your team wants cleaner submissions, better trust outcomes, and less release stress, start by standardizing a simple rule: audit every manifest before shipping. Perm Check makes that rule easy to follow and easy to scale.
Perm Check exists to make extension security and policy readiness practical for everyone who builds on the Chrome ecosystem. Our mission is to reduce avoidable friction between creators and platform expectations by turning manifest permission auditing into a clear, fast, and repeatable process. We believe safe software should not require a large legal team or enterprise security budget. Builders of all sizes deserve reliable tools that help them make better decisions before risk becomes a problem.
We also believe trust is a product feature. Users evaluate extensions through both functionality and perceived safety. When permission requests appear broader than expected, confidence drops quickly. Our mission therefore extends beyond technical scanning. We aim to help teams align code behavior, user communication, and release governance so trust is earned consistently, not promised vaguely.
Every part of Perm Check is designed for clarity. We avoid complex jargon when plain language can drive action. We focus on meaningful findings rather than noisy alerts. Our goal is to support thoughtful shipping decisions under real deadlines while preserving the quality standards that protect users and creators alike.
We build practical auditing workflows centered on extension permission hygiene. The current Perm Check experience analyzes manifest.json content and highlights potentially unnecessary permissions that can increase review scrutiny or erode user trust. It helps creators identify overbroad entries, verify necessity, and apply least-privilege practices before submitting to the Chrome Web Store.
Perm Check supports multiple audiences. Individual developers use it to reduce errors and improve confidence. Product teams use it to standardize release checks. Legal and compliance stakeholders use findings to refine disclosures and policy alignment. Growth teams use cleaner permission profiles to strengthen conversion messaging and user confidence. By serving these stakeholders together, we help organizations move faster without cutting corners on trust and governance.
Our product philosophy is narrow focus and deep utility. Instead of trying to be everything, we prioritize workflows where precision produces measurable value. Permission auditing is one of those workflows. It affects approval outcomes, user sentiment, and long-term brand credibility in ways that deserve focused attention.
Privacy: We design with data minimization and user respect at the center. Extension creators should request only what is needed, and users should understand why that access exists. We advocate transparent, proportionate permission design because privacy is both a legal duty and a trust imperative.
Speed: Responsible shipping should be efficient. We value workflows that reduce review time without reducing rigor. Fast feedback loops help teams fix issues early, avoid launch delays, and maintain momentum. Our tools are built to fit release realities, not idealized processes that teams cannot sustain.
Quality: Quality means consistency between what your extension does, what it asks for, and what you tell users. We care about evidence-based decisions, clear rationale, and repeatable standards. Strong quality systems reduce surprises and create durable product confidence over time.
Accessibility: Security tooling should be understandable to people across roles and experience levels. We prioritize plain language, readable interfaces, and practical guidance so developers, product managers, and compliance reviewers can collaborate effectively. Better accessibility leads to better decisions and better outcomes.
We are committed to keeping core auditing access available at no cost. High-quality security and compliance support should not be locked behind expensive enterprise subscriptions. Free tools enable independent developers, small studios, and early-stage teams to build responsibly from day one. This commitment strengthens the broader extension ecosystem by raising baseline quality and reducing avoidable trust failures.
Providing free access does not mean compromising standards. We invest in accuracy, clarity, and maintainability because creators rely on these tools in high-stakes release moments. We also continuously listen to user feedback to improve usefulness across different extension categories and development workflows.
As we grow, we intend to preserve this open foundation while expanding capabilities that help teams scale their governance maturity. Our long-term vision is an ecosystem where secure defaults and transparent permissions are normal, not exceptional.
We welcome feedback from developers, security practitioners, legal teams, and marketers who want to improve extension trust outcomes. If you have suggestions, bug reports, or ideas for new auditing checks, please contact us at haithemhamtinee@gmail.com. Practical field feedback helps us prioritize updates that solve real release problems.
When you write to us, include your extension context, the permission challenge you encountered, and what outcome you were aiming for. This helps us respond with guidance that is specific and useful. We appreciate every message and are committed to continuous improvement for the creators who trust Perm Check in their workflow.
We are here to help with questions about manifest permission audits, policy preparation workflows, and responsible extension release practices. Whether you are shipping your first extension or managing a mature release pipeline, our team values clear communication and practical guidance.
Support Email
haithemhamtinee@gmail.com
We typically respond within 24–48 hours
To help us provide accurate support quickly, include a clear subject line that describes the issue category, such as permission flag clarification, manifest review question, or audit interpretation request. In the message body, explain the behavior you are seeing, what result you expected, and where in your workflow the issue appears.
If relevant, include a screenshot of the output panel or the specific manifest segment that produced confusion. Context improves response quality and reduces follow-up delays. Please avoid sending sensitive credentials or private tokens in your message.
For support requests, focus on technical behavior, permission rationale, and workflow questions so we can troubleshoot effectively. For business inquiries, include your organization name, use case scope, and timeline. Distinguishing these categories helps us route your request efficiently and provide the right level of detail in our response.
We treat support communications with care and use your message only to respond, improve service quality, and maintain secure operations. We encourage data minimization in all correspondence. Share only the information needed to explain your request. This approach protects your privacy while enabling us to help you quickly and responsibly.
Last updated:
Perm Check provides web-based tools that help users audit Chrome extension manifest permissions for security and compliance readiness. This Privacy Policy explains how we collect, use, store, and protect information when you access or interact with our website and related features. We are committed to transparency, lawful processing, and privacy-by-design principles. This policy applies to visitors, users, and anyone who contacts us through our support channels.
When we refer to Perm Check, we mean the operators responsible for the website and service experience. If you have questions about this policy or data practices, you can contact us at haithemhamtinee@gmail.com. We encourage users to read this policy carefully so they understand what data is processed and why.
We may collect data that you provide directly, such as contact details and message content when you email support. We may also process tool input data in your browser session when you paste manifest information into the interface. Depending on technical configuration, some usage events may be collected for analytics and service quality measurement, such as page views, interaction patterns, and aggregate performance indicators.
We may collect device and network data including browser type, approximate region, referring pages, and IP-related metadata for security and operational diagnostics. We may also use cookies and similar tracking technologies to support functionality, analytics, and advertising. Data categories may include first-party session identifiers and third-party measurement identifiers where applicable.
We use data to provide, maintain, and improve the Perm Check service. This includes rendering core tool functionality, detecting errors, monitoring service reliability, and understanding feature usage trends. We may use contact information to respond to support inquiries and follow up on unresolved issues. We may use aggregate behavior data to improve usability and prioritize product updates.
We may also process information to protect service integrity, enforce terms, prevent abuse, and comply with legal obligations. We do not use your data for purposes that are incompatible with this policy without an appropriate legal basis and notice where required.
Cookies are small files stored on your device that help websites remember information and improve user experience. Perm Check may use essential cookies for functional operation, analytics cookies for measuring performance, and advertising-related cookies where monetization or campaign measurement is enabled. These technologies help us maintain service quality and understand how users interact with key pages.
You can manage cookie preferences through your browser settings and, where available, on-site controls. Disabling certain cookies may affect functionality. We encourage users to review browser-level privacy settings and third-party opt-out tools for greater control.
Perm Check may use third-party services to support analytics and advertising. These services may include Google Analytics for usage measurement and Google AdSense for advertising delivery. Third-party providers may collect data according to their own policies and may use cookies or similar technologies to perform their functions. We select providers with established privacy frameworks and review integration practices regularly.
We do not control third-party privacy policies. Users should review the respective provider documentation to understand data handling details, retention periods, and available opt-out mechanisms. Where required by applicable law, consent mechanisms may be presented before non-essential tracking is activated.
If you are located in the European Economic Area or a jurisdiction with similar protections, you may have rights regarding your personal data. These rights can include access to data we hold, rectification of inaccurate information, erasure under qualifying conditions, restriction of processing, portability of data, and objection to certain processing activities. You may also have the right to withdraw consent where processing is based on consent.
To exercise your rights, contact us at haithemhamtinee@gmail.com with sufficient details to verify your request. We respond within applicable legal timeframes and may request additional information for identity verification to protect data security.
We retain personal data only as long as necessary for the purposes described in this policy, including support operations, legal compliance, dispute resolution, and service improvement. Retention periods vary based on data type, legal requirements, and operational needs. Where feasible, we apply minimization and deletion practices to reduce unnecessary storage.
When data is no longer required, we take reasonable steps to delete or anonymize it. Some records may be retained longer where legal obligations or legitimate interests require preservation.
Perm Check is not directed to children under 13, and we do not knowingly collect personal data from children under 13. If we become aware that such data has been provided without appropriate parental authorization, we will take reasonable steps to delete it. Parents or guardians who believe a child may have provided personal data can contact us for assistance.
We may update this Privacy Policy to reflect changes in legal requirements, technology, or service practices. When material updates occur, we will revise the last updated date and publish the new version on this page. Continued use of the service after updates indicates acknowledgment of the revised terms, where permitted by law.
For privacy questions, rights requests, or policy clarifications, contact: haithemhamtinee@gmail.com. We aim to respond promptly and transparently.
Last updated:
By accessing or using Perm Check, you agree to be bound by these Terms of Service and any applicable laws or regulations. If you do not agree with these terms, you should not use the service. These terms govern your use of all website pages, tools, and related support channels provided under the Perm Check brand.
You represent that you have the legal capacity to enter into these terms. If you use the service on behalf of an organization, you confirm that you have authority to bind that organization to these terms.
Perm Check provides a web-based tool designed to analyze Chrome extension manifest permissions and highlight potentially unnecessary access declarations that may create security or policy concerns. The service is informational and supportive in nature. It is intended to help users improve release quality and compliance readiness but does not replace legal advice, professional security audits, or official platform guidance.
We may update, modify, suspend, or discontinue parts of the service at any time to maintain reliability, improve functionality, or meet legal obligations.
You may use Perm Check for lawful purposes related to extension development, auditing, and quality assurance. You agree not to misuse the service, attempt unauthorized access, interfere with system integrity, distribute malicious content, or use automation that degrades availability for others. You also agree not to use findings as a substitute for complying with official policy requirements or legal obligations.
You remain solely responsible for your extension submissions, product behavior, and all decisions made based on tool outputs. Perm Check recommendations should be reviewed in context and validated through testing and policy review.
All content, branding, interface elements, software components, and related materials provided by Perm Check are protected by applicable intellectual property laws. Except as expressly allowed, you may not reproduce, distribute, reverse engineer, or create derivative works from service components without prior written permission. Your use of the service does not grant ownership rights in our intellectual property.
You retain rights in content you submit to the tool, subject to any processing necessary to provide the service as described in our Privacy Policy.
Perm Check is provided on an as-is and as-available basis. We make no guarantee that the service will be uninterrupted, error-free, or suitable for every use case. We do not warrant that tool outputs will satisfy every platform policy requirement, prevent all rejections, or detect every possible issue. Users should independently verify results and seek qualified professional advice where appropriate.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we disclaim all warranties, express or implied, including merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, and non-infringement.
To the maximum extent permitted by applicable law, Perm Check and its operators shall not be liable for indirect, incidental, special, consequential, or punitive damages, including lost profits, lost data, business interruption, or reputational harm arising from use of or inability to use the service. Our total liability for any claim related to the service shall be limited to the amount you paid, if any, for accessing the service during the twelve months before the event giving rise to liability.
Some jurisdictions do not allow certain limitations, so parts of this section may not apply to you to the extent prohibited by law.
Perm Check may use cookies and similar technologies for essential functionality, analytics, and advertising support. Data handling practices are described in our Privacy Policy and Cookies Policy. Where required, we provide notice and consent options for non-essential cookies. Users in the EEA and similar jurisdictions may have data protection rights including access, correction, deletion, portability, and objection to processing.
By using the service, you acknowledge that data processing may occur in accordance with applicable laws and our published policies.
The service may contain links to third-party websites, services, or documentation. We provide these links for convenience and do not control third-party content, availability, or policies. Accessing third-party resources is at your own risk, and you should review their terms and privacy practices independently.
We may modify service features, remove content, or adjust functionality to improve performance, security, and compliance. We may also update these Terms of Service periodically. Continued use of the service after updated terms are posted constitutes acceptance of the revised terms, subject to applicable law.
We recommend reviewing these terms regularly to stay informed about your rights and responsibilities.
These terms are governed by and construed in accordance with applicable laws in the jurisdiction determined by our principal operations, without regard to conflict-of-law principles. You agree that disputes arising under these terms may be resolved in competent courts as permitted by law, unless alternative dispute procedures are required.
For questions about these Terms of Service, contact haithemhamtinee@gmail.com.